RTE Act- More issues

The upholding of the RTE Act by the Supreme Court has been a shot in the arm for the HRD ministry. However, instead of ushering in a 'licence raj' wherein only private institutions are held accountable, the government should do some soul-searching too.

The focus currently appears to be on the responsibility that private schools have to share by admitting 25% of students at the entry level. There are two issues related to this that I wish to bring out.

Firstly, there is ambiguity in the definition of 'entry level'. Most of the schools have their entry at the KG level. Let us assume that they have 4 sections with 40 students each. The intake of students from economically weak sections would be 40 in this case (25% as per RTE).

Schools would be well within the law if they start a pre-school with only one section with say 40 students. Then they would have to admit only 10 students from the poor sections of the society. 4 sections continue to function from the KG level onwards with new admissions. This is a situation wherein pre-school is the de-jure entry level and KG is the de- facto entry level.

The second point that I wish to highlight is that when admitting children from economically weaker backgrounds under the RTE, the government is only making the class rooms and the infrastructure available to these children. But a school is much more. It is an entire socio-economic-academic system. Have we given a thought about what psychological and financial impact will studying in an affluent school have on the child and the parent. The RTE has ensured entry, but who will pay for the school trips or dresses to be bought for annual day or the birthday parties of classmates. A child at the age of 5 or 6 or even 10 is too young to understand the financial implications of these. In trying to keep up with the classmates, the parents of the child are likely to suffer severe financial strain or the child is likely to grow up with a deep sense of inferiority. Where then would the RTE lead us to?
Let us not close our eyes to these practical issues which almost every parent experiences.

Instead of getting into a debate with the private schools and trying to enforce the rules for them, government should examine its own performance on the educational front. The government should focus on improving the facilities in government-aided schools, quality of teachers and act as an enabler for improving the educational environment. The only focus should be on ways to improve the standard of schooling, teaching and learning, not just for the poor and underprivileged children but all children.