The incident at Nyoma camp involving a fracas between officers and jawan is symptomatic of the changes tearing at the cultural fabric of the Indian Army. It would not be presumptuous to say that that it is not the last incident of its kind if urgent measures are not taken.
The incident needs to be examined in the following contexts before we explore the measures that need to be taken :-
a. Diminishing gap between the backgrounds of officers and jawans.
b. Conduct of officers and ladies.
c. Effective command vs failure of command.
The gap between the backgrounds of the officers and the jawans has rapidly diminished. The intake into the officer cadre is no more from the ‘elite’ or the ‘educated’ class only as it was sat three decades ago. Earlier, a large percentage of officer’s children use to follow their father’s footsteps into the armed forces. Now that space has been occupied by children of Junior Commissioned Officers/ Other Ranks. This has been made possible by the urgent and necessary steps taken by the armed forces to make quality education available to children of JCOs/Ors by way of establishing Army Schools and other institutes. These children are driven by the natural ambition of achieving a better station in life than their father did. There are other children who join the army as a jawan.
Now imagine a hypothetical situation wherein two boys are studying in the same class. Both have a crush on the same girl but she likes only one. One kid gets through the entrance exam and joins the NDA. The other boy, who was liked by the girl, could not get through the entrance test and his father gets him enrolled as a jawan with the hope that he can work his way to a commission while in the army.
The first boy comes to the unit as a lieutenant after getting commissioned. The second boy is serving in the same unit as a jawan. What will be the relationship between the two?
Their secret ‘crush’ in the meanwhile has gone through college and her father gets her married to the officer. The other man is crestfallen. Potential for personal conflict spilling into the professional domain?
Having said that, the issue is much more complex. It is about reduced tolerance of indiscreet acts committed by officers, amongst the other ranks. I remember the time when as young officers we acted rashly a number of times but the jawan continued to look up to us and was very unquestioning. The gap in our educational and social backgrounds had a lot to do with this. Now with a large number of officers and jawans coming from similar backgrounds, the gap is indistinguishable. The unquestioning attitude has given way to expressing dissent. The onus is now on the officer to win the respect of men under him by way of his professional conduct. He cannot take it for granted.
The actions of officers are deeply scrutinized and questioned by the men under his command. An officer’s conduct has to be above board at all times. This responsibility devolves on to officers’ families also. They have to conduct themselves in a manner that does not give reason for anybody to take liberties or invite opprobrium. This includes the way they dress, talk and conduct themselves in public or at home where the ‘sahayak’ is present. Unfortunately, many of our young ladies are not adequately made aware of this responsibility and they behave as college-going students would do. There is a need to sensitize them about what is appropriate conduct in the context of the armed forces.
A few officers’ families staying in non-family stations/ field-areas was a privilege and it was not questioned earlier. But given the present socio-economic aspirations, the jawan has started resenting this privilege and questions as to why he cannot keep his family too. Such thought process often leads to frustration resulting in unacceptable behavior. Therefore, the commanders at all levels will have to revisit this aspect and a uniform policy implemented. There can be no exceptions.
There are greater demands being placed on the commanding officer in terms of man-management. The aspiration and expectation levels are very high all around. The commanding officer has to be and seen to be above perceived partisan interests. He needs to know the pulse of the men under his command including his officers.
In this particular incident, the Commanding Officer did well to intervene but was not effective. Only the court of inquiry will bring out whether the act of young officers beating up the jawan for misbehaving with a Major’s wife was one of spontaneous outburst or the culmination of a series of misdemeanors on part of the jawan which were not appropriately addressed earlier. If it was the latter, it would be clear case of failure of command.
The court of inquiry would certainly bring out the causes of the incidence and exemplary punishment meted out to those found guilty.
The Army also needs to do serious introspection and come up with a code of conduct keeping the present socio-economic realities in mind. And as always the onus lies with those in command, at all levels. The officer cadre has its task cut out for itself.
The incident needs to be examined in the following contexts before we explore the measures that need to be taken :-
a. Diminishing gap between the backgrounds of officers and jawans.
b. Conduct of officers and ladies.
c. Effective command vs failure of command.
The gap between the backgrounds of the officers and the jawans has rapidly diminished. The intake into the officer cadre is no more from the ‘elite’ or the ‘educated’ class only as it was sat three decades ago. Earlier, a large percentage of officer’s children use to follow their father’s footsteps into the armed forces. Now that space has been occupied by children of Junior Commissioned Officers/ Other Ranks. This has been made possible by the urgent and necessary steps taken by the armed forces to make quality education available to children of JCOs/Ors by way of establishing Army Schools and other institutes. These children are driven by the natural ambition of achieving a better station in life than their father did. There are other children who join the army as a jawan.
Now imagine a hypothetical situation wherein two boys are studying in the same class. Both have a crush on the same girl but she likes only one. One kid gets through the entrance exam and joins the NDA. The other boy, who was liked by the girl, could not get through the entrance test and his father gets him enrolled as a jawan with the hope that he can work his way to a commission while in the army.
The first boy comes to the unit as a lieutenant after getting commissioned. The second boy is serving in the same unit as a jawan. What will be the relationship between the two?
Their secret ‘crush’ in the meanwhile has gone through college and her father gets her married to the officer. The other man is crestfallen. Potential for personal conflict spilling into the professional domain?
Having said that, the issue is much more complex. It is about reduced tolerance of indiscreet acts committed by officers, amongst the other ranks. I remember the time when as young officers we acted rashly a number of times but the jawan continued to look up to us and was very unquestioning. The gap in our educational and social backgrounds had a lot to do with this. Now with a large number of officers and jawans coming from similar backgrounds, the gap is indistinguishable. The unquestioning attitude has given way to expressing dissent. The onus is now on the officer to win the respect of men under him by way of his professional conduct. He cannot take it for granted.
The actions of officers are deeply scrutinized and questioned by the men under his command. An officer’s conduct has to be above board at all times. This responsibility devolves on to officers’ families also. They have to conduct themselves in a manner that does not give reason for anybody to take liberties or invite opprobrium. This includes the way they dress, talk and conduct themselves in public or at home where the ‘sahayak’ is present. Unfortunately, many of our young ladies are not adequately made aware of this responsibility and they behave as college-going students would do. There is a need to sensitize them about what is appropriate conduct in the context of the armed forces.
A few officers’ families staying in non-family stations/ field-areas was a privilege and it was not questioned earlier. But given the present socio-economic aspirations, the jawan has started resenting this privilege and questions as to why he cannot keep his family too. Such thought process often leads to frustration resulting in unacceptable behavior. Therefore, the commanders at all levels will have to revisit this aspect and a uniform policy implemented. There can be no exceptions.
There are greater demands being placed on the commanding officer in terms of man-management. The aspiration and expectation levels are very high all around. The commanding officer has to be and seen to be above perceived partisan interests. He needs to know the pulse of the men under his command including his officers.
In this particular incident, the Commanding Officer did well to intervene but was not effective. Only the court of inquiry will bring out whether the act of young officers beating up the jawan for misbehaving with a Major’s wife was one of spontaneous outburst or the culmination of a series of misdemeanors on part of the jawan which were not appropriately addressed earlier. If it was the latter, it would be clear case of failure of command.
The court of inquiry would certainly bring out the causes of the incidence and exemplary punishment meted out to those found guilty.
The Army also needs to do serious introspection and come up with a code of conduct keeping the present socio-economic realities in mind. And as always the onus lies with those in command, at all levels. The officer cadre has its task cut out for itself.
